Hi there,
I was wondering if someone could clear up a problem I have. I have to review the assumptions of a fixed effects model of a certain study.
One of the assumptions we learned for efficiency of a FE model, is that the error terms in different time periods are uncorrelated (called serial correlation). In the article they don't talk about this, and we don't have the data to check for ourselves.
Let's say there is serial correlation. How do you overcome this? I read in other discussions here that this can be overcome by clustering at the identifying unit variable.
They use a stratified sample, with the strata being on the school, and the unit being individuals. They use standard errors that are clustered by the sampling stratum. I believe they mean that the SE are clustered at the school identifying variable. Or am I interpreting this wrong?
Would this overcome serial correlation as well? Since the clustering is not happening at the unit variable (assuming my interpretation is correct).
Thank you in advance (:
Related Posts with overcome serial correlation error terms in fixed effects
Merged file size is ~5X the source: Mechanism behind MergeHello, This is my first post on Statalist and I have tried my best to follow posting advice in the …
Test to compare Positive and Negative Predictive Value?Hi all, I wonder if its possible use a test to compare Positive and Negative Predictive Value with …
Changing a discrete variable into a dummy and loosing significanceDear all, I am writing an essay using an unbalanced panel dataset. Right now I am using a Linear Pr…
IV variable option in Stata program syntaxHello I am trying to write a program to run a regression based on some criteria and I want to add t…
generating dummy variables for consecutive yearsHi everyone! I am quite new to Stata and I probably have a simple question, but I am not able to fi…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to overcome serial correlation error terms in fixed effects
Post a Comment