Hi everyone,
I am carrying out a study on the effect of unemployment on happiness(individual satisfaction).
The methodology of previous studies I have been using used ordered probit and ordered logit regression on STATA.
I attempted to do the same for my data set, I am using the UKHLS(UK Household longitudinal study).
Literature shows that there should be an inverse relationship between unemployment and individual satisfaction.
However, when I regress my dep (happiness score) with independent dummy variable unemployment as well as other variables I get the wrong coefficient signs.
Can anyone advise me with what I am doing wrong and why I am getting the wrong coefficient signs?
Much thanks.
Related Posts with Wrong efficient signs on regression
Missing dataHello! I am currently figuring out how to deal with with missing data. According to the user guide,…
Near perfect correlation between dummy variable and outcome variable, all checks on data indicate there is no problem with underlying data.I am facing a bit of a problem and I can't seem to figure out what the issue might be. I am currentl…
Stacked bar graph for multiple policies for states across yearsIs there any efficient way of illustrating these following policies in a stacked bar graph like the …
Inlcude industry- and year-fixed effects in regressionHello, I want to do a regression with one dependent variable and an independent variable and a few …
combining commands to keep and drop certain observationsI would be grateful for advice on whether I need to execute the commands step by step (in what seque…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Wrong efficient signs on regression
Post a Comment