Dear All:
I use logistic regression analysis to model the likelihood that a drug-development project results in termination or approval. We include firm-specific fixed effects to control for unobserved firm heterogeneity. Our independent variables include failure and success experience of the firms. We assume that how many times you have failed or succeed in the past will affect your chances of future failure.
One of the reviewers at a journal suggested using Heckman selection model. After reading about it it seems to me that this would be redundant as our model already includes firm-specific fixed effects. I am just wondering if I am missing something in their suggestion.
Thanks
Antonio
Related Posts with Heckman Correction
meta forestplot: no subgroup titlesI'm running -meta forestplot- (which I like) on the attached data. I have two subgroups. By default …
Problem with ttesti: 'Est_A' found where number expectedHi, For the below data sample, my point estimates of interest are shown in Est_A and Est_B. Also, co…
for bgshade command, what's the matter with my code and if the command can work on pannel data?I want to use the bgshade command to draw shadows, but I didn't succeed. I don't know where the prob…
Identifying significant difference between two categorical variables (need help regarding the statistical test)Hi! Everyone, while reading an article I came across the following lines where the author used some …
output the results of xtunitrootDear All, How can I output (word or excel) the testing results of -xtunitroot- command. For example,…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Heckman Correction
Post a Comment