Specialized on Data processing, Data management Implementation plan, Data Collection tools - electronic and paper base, Data cleaning specifications, Data extraction, Data transformation, Data load, Analytical Datasets, and Data analysis. BJ Data Tech Solutions teaches on design and developing Electronic Data Collection Tools using CSPro, and STATA commands for data manipulation. Setting up Data Management systems using modern data technologies such as Relational Databases, C#, PHP and Android.
Wednesday, October 27, 2021
Treatment-covariate interaction in ipdmetan!
Hi everyone,
I'm running a two-stage IPD meta-analysis by using ipdmetan to assess treatment-covariate interaction (e.g., group [LBP vs control] x BMI covariate) on postural control measures.
I would like to ask whether is possible to NOT include a full factorial interaction, for example:
(1) ipdmetan, study(StudyID) interaction random(reml) effect() title(RMS-EC-AP - Group × Age) texts(110) forest(favours(Control # LBP)) xlab(-6 0 6): xtmixed RMS i0.GroupTwo#c.BMI i0.GroupTwo i.Sex c.Age if Eyes==1 & Direction==1
Here in this model, I only included i0.GroupTwo#c.BMI i0.GroupTwo, but I did not include c.BMI
Or should I use a full factorial interaction:
(2) ipdmetan, study(StudyID) interaction random(reml) effect() title(RMS-EC-AP - Group × Age) texts(110) forest(favours(Control # LBP)) xlab(-6 0 6): xtmixed RMS i0.GroupTwo##c.BMI i.Sex c.Age if Eyes==1 & Direction==1
Here in this model, I included i0.GroupTwo#c.BMI i0.GroupTwo c.BMI
This because the results in some measures were significantly different between both models. The first model indicated a significant difference with higher effect size while the second one showed no significant difference.
Thanks
No comments:
Post a Comment