I have recently joined a company heavy in "Data Science". I thought, great, I love statistics myself so this is a perfect match in heaven, except that, our "Data Scientists" don't seem to have much statistical background, meaning, they would use xgboost, tensorflow, pytorch and various other frameworks, but they have no idea what does it means to reject the null hypothesis, or what's an r^2 or rmse, AIC, BIC, etc.
Is this something common in the industry, have you observed that too in the workplace, or did I just get lucky?
Related Posts with Stata: Statistics vs "Data Science"
Interpretation of multiple interaction model (diff-in-diff)Hi, I have made a diff-in-diff model for the returns of high rated ESG firms vs. low. This model in…
AUC and ordinal testsI want to validate a predictive model of overall survival of prostate cancer in our sample of cancer…
nlsur aids returned 198Hello everyone, I'm trying to estimate this system of 2 nonlinear equations through this program. Wh…
Wild cluster bootstrap problemHi everyone, I am estimating an instrumental variable model with time fixed effects and region fixe…
Fixed Effects and Dummy VariableHi, I have a question related to using dummy variable in fixed effects model. The data set I used i…
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
0 Response to Stata: Statistics vs "Data Science"
Post a Comment